ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) features on clinical course and outcomes of Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and clinical course of FMF after COVID-19. METHODS: Consecutive FMF patients with COVID-19 were enrolled from three referral hospitals. Clinical features of FMF and detailed COVID-19 information were obtained from patient interviews and medical records. RESULTS: Seventy-three FMF patients were included in the study. Sixty-nine patients had clinical symptoms of COVID-19, and 90.4% of patients received COVID-19 specific treatment. We found 24.7% hospitalization, %12.3 respiratory support, 4.1% ICU admission, 6.8% complication, and 1.4 % mortality rate in patients. Male gender and older age were significantly frequent in inpatients compared to outpatients (male gender 77.8 % vs 25.8%, p<0.001; median age 39.5 vs 32 years, p:0.043). FMF features were similar in both groups. The risk factors of hospitalization for respiratory support were male gender (OR: 7.167 (95% CI:1.368-37.535)), greater age (OR:1.067 (95% CI:1.016-1.121)) and non-adherence to colchicine treatment before the infection (OR:7.5 (95% CI: 1.348-41.722)). One-third of patients (33.3%) had reported attacks after COVID-19. The patterns of triggered attacks were fever, peritonitis, pleuritis, transient arthritis, chronic knee mono-arthritis, and protracted febrile myalgia. CONCLUSION: FMF characteristics were not associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19. Colchicine non-adherence was the risk factor of hospitalization for oxygen support. The rate of FMF attacks after COVID-19 is prominently increased with some of them be protracted and destructive.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases faced several challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Uncertainties such as the lack of evidence regarding the use of immunosuppressive (IS) therapies and deferred patient care because of limited health resources affected negatively on many aspects of treatment decisions and routine follow-up of the patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the impact of the pandemic on delays in routine clinical follow-up, changes in IS treatment, and COVID-19 vaccination status of patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). METHODS: The study was performed between July and September 2021. TAK patients who registered in our database were investigated with regards to the COVID-19 infection and vaccination status, delays in routine clinical visits, changes in their IS treatments, and flares during the pandemic. Physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging of the patients were performed and ITAS2010 scores were calculated. RESULTS: There were 56 adult TAK patients (87.5% female and median age 47 years). A total of 44 (78.6%) patients experienced a delay with routine follow-up visits to their physicians and about 20% of patients stopped their antirheumatic treatments without consulting their physicians. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 pandemic, 16 (28.5%) patients flared. In total group, 13 (23.2%) patients had a mild COVID-19 infection and about 90% of the patients had received the COVID-19 vaccine. DISCUSSION: Deferred patient care and disease flares are the most significant problems in TAK patients during the pandemic. The risk of TAK flares may outweigh the risk of COVID-19 infection.